CBM Calculator — Cubic Metres, Cubic Feet and Density

Measure in centimetres, inches, feet, millimetres or metres — a different unit on every line if that is how the paperwork arrived — and get the shipment volume in cubic metres and cubic feet together. Enter weights as well and the density section works out pounds per cubic foot, which is the figure a domestic LTL carrier is most likely to ask you for.

CBM calculator

Examples:
L x W x H L H W
Cartons

Use the outside, packed measurements. One line per carton size — add another line rather than averaging two different sizes together.

Volumetric weight, freight cost and container capacity
Volumetric weight is length × width × height in cm ÷ this number. Carriers set their own — check yours before you quote.
Your own quoted rate. Nothing here knows any freight rates.
A three-letter code, shown next to the estimate. No conversion is done.
Container capacity used for the comparison (m³)

Pre-filled from Hapag-Lloyd's published example specifications. These are the geometric volume of an empty box, not usable loading space, and they vary by manufacturer — edit them to match the equipment you are actually booking.

Enter a carton size and press Calculate CBM, or load one of the examples above.

Convert a volume

Already have a volume and just want it in another unit. Same exact ratios as the calculator above.

Two unit systems, one shipment

The awkward part of measuring freight in Canada is rarely the arithmetic. It is that the packing list arrived in centimetres, the carrier quotes in cubic feet, and somebody has to reconcile the two without introducing an error along the way.

This page takes the unit on each line separately. A skid measured in inches, cartons measured in centimetres and a crate measured in feet can all sit in the same consignment; each is converted on its own before anything is summed, and both totals — cubic metres and cubic feet — come out together.

Lines are added, never averaged. An averaged unit standing in for several real sizes is a different calculation with a different answer, not a close approximation, and on a mixed skid load the gap is easily a cubic metre.

Internally every measurement is an exact fraction rather than a decimal, so 40 × 30 × 25 cm × 10 reads as exactly 0.3 m³ instead of the 0.30000000000000004 ordinary machine arithmetic produces for that particular product.

Converting between cubic metres and cubic feet

One cubic metre is 35.3147 cubic feet and one cubic foot is 0.0283 cubic metres. Both figures come from a definition rather than a measurement: the international foot is exactly 0.3048 m, so a cubic foot is exactly 0.028316846592 m³. That exactness is why a value converted and converted back comes out unchanged here instead of drifting.

The inch works the same way — exactly 2.54 cm, so a cubic inch is exactly 0.000016387064 m³. If you prefer the divisor form, multiply the three inch measurements and divide by 61,023.744.

A 48 × 40 × 48 inch skid, the common North American footprint loaded to four feet, is 92,160 cubic inches. That is 1.5102 m³, or 53.33 cubic feet.

The conversion block above the article moves between cubic metres, cubic feet and litres directly when you already have a figure and only need it in another unit.

The formula, and a mixed-unit example

In metres the formula holds nothing back: CBM = length × width × height × quantity.

Take a consignment with both unit systems in it. Two skids at 48 × 40 × 48 inches are 1.5102 m³ each, so 3.0205 m³. Ten cartons at 40 × 30 × 25 cm are 0.03 m³ each, so 0.30 m³. The shipment comes to 3.3205 m³, which is 117.2611 cubic feet.

Convert by hand instead and the usual slip is rounding the inch-to-metre step to 0.025 before cubing it — which looks harmless and lands 4.65 % low on the skid volume. The unit selector avoids the question entirely.

Quantity is a plain multiplier, so doubling a line doubles its volume and nothing else moves. That gives you a check for free: a declared total that is not a clean multiple of the single-unit volume points at the measuring or the counting rather than at the sum.

Density, and why LTL asks for it

Domestic less-than-truckload freight in North America is normally rated on density rather than on a volumetric divisor. Density is simply weight over volume, quoted in pounds per cubic foot: take the total weight of the piece, skid included, and divide by its volume in cubic feet.

A 48 × 40 × 48 inch skid is 53.33 cubic feet. At 600 lb that is 11.25 lb/ft³; at 900 lb the same skid is 16.88 lb/ft³. The volume has not changed and the freight has not changed shape — only the ratio the carrier reads.

This page gives you the volume half exactly, in both cubic metres and cubic feet, and the weight half from what you enter. The classification a carrier then applies to that density belongs to its tariff, changes, and is not something a calculator should guess at, so nothing here names one.

Density and volumetric weight are two answers to the same commercial problem — light freight taking up paid space — and they are not interchangeable. If a quote mentions a divisor, it is volumetric weight; if it asks for pounds per cubic foot, it is density.

Volumetric weight for air and courier

Where a divisor is used rather than a density, the shape is: volumetric weight (kg) = length (cm) × width (cm) × height (cm) × quantity ÷ divisor. Chargeable weight is then the greater of that and the actual gross weight.

Published divisors: 6000 is IATA's general rule for air cargo, 5000 is DHL Express's standard for its express products, 3000 corresponds to the 1:3 ratio on rail and 1000 to the 1:1 ratio on sea LCL. Road freight has no general rule; ratios differ by country and carrier.

A smaller divisor makes the same box heavier on paper. Ten cartons at 40 × 30 × 25 cm are 0.3 m³, or 300,000 cm³: 50 kg at a divisor of 6000, 60 kg at 5000, and 300 kg on the sea LCL ratio. If those cartons are 12 kg apiece, an airline bills the 120 kg actual weight while the same freight moving LCL is assessed at 300 kg.

Carriers change divisors, use different ones for different services, and some apply a minimum chargeable weight per piece. This page applies the divisor you pick across the whole shipment; one assessed piece by piece and rounded up each time lands a little higher.

Measuring a skid so the number survives the terminal

What is charged for is the space the unit occupies on the equipment, so measure the outside of the finished, wrapped unit — not the product, and not the carton's inside.

Measure after wrapping. A loaded skid bulges, and banding, corner boards and stretch film each add a little. Take the widest point, including any overhang past the deck.

Include the deck in the height. A four-foot load on a five-inch skid is a 53-inch unit, and the trailer has to take all of it.

Round up rather than down. The terminal rounds up when it re-measures, and a centimetre of optimism buys nothing.

Irregular items are charged on the rectangular space they need, so measure the box that would contain the item rather than the item itself.

Against a container

Ocean freight divides at roughly one container. Below it you buy space in a shared box and the rate comes per cubic metre or per freight ton, the freight ton being whichever is greater of one tonne and one cubic metre. Above it you book a container outright and the question becomes whether the cargo fits rather than what the volume costs.

Published internal volumes are where that question starts. Hapag-Lloyd's example specifications give 33.2 m³ for a 20ft, 67.7 m³ for a 40ft and 76.3 m³ for a 40ft high cube, and the carrier notes they are examples because containers differ by manufacturer.

Treat them as a ceiling nobody reaches. That volume assumes corner-to-corner packing with no gaps. Skid footprints leave dead space along the walls, freight cannot always be stacked to the roof without crushing, the door opening is narrower than the box, and the payload limit frequently bites first.

The container line in the result is therefore a share of a geometric volume and says so. Whether a load actually goes in is what a forwarder's load plan tells you.

Common mistakes

Rounding the unit conversion before cubing it. 0.025 m instead of 0.0254 m looks like a rounding decision and is a 4.7 % error once all three sides are multiplied.

The wrong power of ten. Centimetres become cubic metres by dividing by 1,000,000 and millimetres by 1,000,000,000, because the conversion is cubed with the dimensions.

Confusing density with volumetric weight. One is a ratio the carrier reads; the other is a weight the carrier bills. They are not two names for the same figure.

Averaging different piece sizes. Covered above, and easy to miss because the result looks perfectly reasonable.

Reading a container's capacity as loadable space. Internal volume measures an empty box; loading efficiency is a separate question, and palletised freight reaches well under it.

What this page does not know

It calculates volume and converts units. It holds no freight rates, no carrier tariff, no freight classification and no customs rule, and it cannot tell you what a shipment will cost. The cost line multiplies your volume by a rate you supply, leaving out minimum charges, accessorials, fuel surcharges, a freight-ton basis and everything else on a real invoice.

Volumetric weight is worked out across the whole shipment on the divisor you choose. A carrier may use a different one, assess each piece separately, or apply a minimum, so read the figure as a way of checking a quote rather than predicting one. Container capacities are geometric volumes from a published specification and say nothing about whether cargo will load.

Each edge is capped at 100 m and each line at 1,000,000 pieces, far past any real shipment and enough to keep the exact arithmetic instant. Everything runs in your browser and nothing you enter leaves the page.

Sources and methodology

Unit conversions are exact by definition and are implemented as exact ratios rather than decimal approximations: 1 inch = 2.54 cm and 1 foot = 0.3048 m exactly (NIST, Guide to the SI, Appendix B), and the litre is exactly one cubic decimetre, so 1 m³ = 1,000 L.

The 6000 divisor and the rule that the greater of actual and volumetric weight is billed come from IATA's material on air cargo tariffs and rules. The 5000 divisor is DHL Express's published standard. The 1:3 rail and 1:1 sea ratios, and the note that road ratios vary, come from DHL Global Forwarding's guide to chargeable weight.

Container capacities of 33.2 / 67.7 / 76.3 m³ are Hapag-Lloyd's published example specifications, quoted with that carrier's own caveat that specifications vary by manufacturer.

Density is defined here as weight divided by volume and nothing more. No freight classification is named or implied: classes sit in a carrier's tariff, are revised, and are not something a volume calculator is in a position to assert.

Every worked figure on this page is recalculated by tests/cbm-lib.test.js and checked there against a hand calculation.

Frequently asked questions

How do I calculate CBM?

Convert length, width and height to metres, multiply them for one piece, then multiply by the number of pieces. A 40 × 30 × 25 cm carton is 0.40 × 0.30 × 0.25 = 0.03 m³, so ten come to 0.3 m³. Staying in centimetres, multiply the three figures and divide by 1,000,000.

How do I convert cubic metres to cubic feet?

Multiply by 35.3147. One cubic metre is 35.3147 ft³, and one cubic foot is 0.0283 m³. Both directions are exact, because the foot is defined as exactly 0.3048 m — so converting a figure and converting it straight back returns what you started with rather than a rounding artefact.

Can I mix inches and centimetres in one shipment?

Yes. Each line carries its own unit and is converted on its own before anything is added, so a skid measured in inches and cartons measured in centimetres can sit in the same consignment without anyone converting by hand. That is usually where a hand-converted total goes wrong.

How do I calculate freight density?

Density is weight divided by volume, in the units the carrier asks for — in North America that is normally pounds per cubic foot. Take the total weight of the piece including its skid, and divide by its volume in cubic feet. A 48 × 40 × 48 inch skid is 53.33 ft³, so at 600 lb it works out to 11.25 lb/ft³.

Is density the same as volumetric weight?

No, though they answer the same worry from opposite directions. Volumetric weight turns volume into a weight using a divisor and bills whichever is greater. Density leaves both figures alone and reports the ratio, which a carrier then reads against its own tariff. Air and courier shipments use volumetric weight; domestic LTL is usually rated on density.

What is 1 CBM?

One cubic metre — the space inside a box one metre on each side. Exactly 1,000 litres, exactly 1,000,000 cubic centimetres, and 35.3147 cubic feet. A 100 × 100 × 100 cm carton is one CBM exactly.

What is chargeable weight?

The greater of the actual gross weight and the volumetric weight. Dense freight bills on what it weighs, light and bulky freight on the space it takes. Enter a weight per piece here and the two are shown together with the higher one marked.

How many cubic metres fit in a 40ft container?

Hapag-Lloyd publishes about 67.7 m³ for a 40ft and 76.3 m³ for a 40ft high cube as example specifications, with 33.2 m³ for a 20ft. Those describe an empty box. Skid footprints, stacking limits, the door opening and the weight limit all bring the loadable figure down.

Should I measure the skid as well as the freight on it?

Yes — the skid and anything overhanging it. The carrier is charging for the space the unit occupies on the trailer, so measure the loaded unit at its widest and tallest points, deck included.

Is anything I type sent anywhere?

No. Everything runs in JavaScript inside your own browser; nothing is transmitted and nothing is stored on a server.

Calculations people often need alongside this one.

More in Shipping & Freight All calculators

Explore more calculators

Free calculators for maths, money, school, health, dates and more — no sign-up.

All calculators